Performance Of Hybrid Green-Tech Lightweight Prism Composite Floor Panel

  • Mohd Isa Jaffar Civil Engineering Department, Politeknik Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
  • Kartini Kamarulzaman Civil Engineering Department, Politeknik Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
  • Hasmawi Khalid Civil Engineering Department, Politeknik Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia
Keywords: Lightweight Composite, Flexural Strength, High Performance, Moment of Inertia

Abstract

Hybrid Green-tech Lightweight Prism Composite (HGLC) is a lightweight panel floor structure compared to conventional concrete slab because it has a thin cross-section which can reduce the load transferred to the structure of beams, columns and even the foundation of the building. Flexural strength studies on lightweight composite floor structures previously focused on strength test on a composite prism that changed the cross section of the profiled steel sheeting from a trapezium to a rectangle cross section. The objective of this study is to identify the performance of flexural strength composite prism by focusing on various parameter including cross-section, the use of dry boards and concrete infill. Apart from that, a comparison of the flexural strength value will be made on the difference cross section between the trapezium and rectangle composite prism compared to the control sample. Data analysis results found the flexural strength increase in rectangular composite prisms without dry board concrete infill (P6 Sample), which is 69% compared to trapezoidal composite prisms (P3 Sample) of only 37%. The bending moment for the P6 sample also increased by 74% compared to the P3 sample which was only 34%. Overall, the objective of this study was achieved when it was possible to identify a significant increase driven by the change in cross-section from the original shape of a trapezoid to a rectangle where there was a 27% increase in the moment of inertia. Therefore, this study has a positive impact, where the proposed rectangular cross-section profiled steel panel can be made into a high- performance lightweight composite panel structure for domestic buildings to support the use of the Industrialized Building System (IBS) in the future.

References

Awang, H. & Wan Badaruzzaman W. H., 2008. Behaviour of individual panel of profiled steel sheet dry board roof system. Proceeding of the ASEAN Federation of Engineering Organizations, Bangkok.

BS EN12390-5:2009 Part 5: Flexural Strength of Test Specimens.

Dobrowolski, J.A. 1998. Concrete construction handbook, Ed. ke-4. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill. Johnson, R. P. 1975. Composite structures of steel and concrete. London: Granada Publishing Ltd
Mohamad-Kamar KA et al 2009 Industrialised Building System (IBS): A review of experiences in UK and Malaysian construction. In: Construction industry research achievement

Mohsen A, Yunus R, Handan R, Kasim N, Hussain K 2019 Determining factors for enhanced skilled worker requirements in IBS construction projects in Malaysia. In: IOP Conference series: earth and environmental science, 220 p

Namdeo Adkuji Hedaoo, Laxmikant Madanmanohar Gupta and Girish Narayanrao Ronghe 2012 Design of composite slabs with profiled steel decking: a comparison between experimental and analytical studies. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering 2012, 3:1

Nasrun M, Nawi M, Akmar F, Nifa A, Osman WN 2015 Malaysian industrialised building system (IBS): a review of studies Malaysian industrialised building system (IBS): a review of studies. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 9:99–101

Norhaiza Binti Nordin. Pembangunan Satu Sistem Bangunan Berindustri (IBS) 2014 – Lantai Pasang Siap Sistem Kepingan Keluli Berprofil Papan Kering. Thesis PhD. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Seraji, M. 2013 Membrane action in the profiled steel sheeting dry board (PSSDB) floor system. Tesis Dr. Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.


Shodiq, H.B.M. 2004 Performance of new profiled steel sheeting dry board floor system with concrete infill. PhD. Thesis. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

StructX 2022 https://structx.com/Shape_Formulas_015.html

Viest, I. M., Colaco, J. P., Furlong, R. W., Griffis, L. G., Leon, R. T. & Wyllie, Jr. L. A. 1997. Composite construction design for buildings. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wan Badaruzzaman, W. H. & Evans, H. R. 1995. Profiled steel sheeting dry board system as an alternative to existing traditional systems. Proceeding of ICAST 1, hlm. 139-145.

Wan Badaruzzaman, W. H., Shodiq H.M. and Khalim, A. R., 2002. The Effect of Conrete Infill and Topping to the Structural Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheeting Dryboard (PSSDB) Flooring System.Proceeding of 2nd World Engineering Congress: 245-247.

Wright, H. D. & Evans, H. R. 1986. Profiled steel sheeting for the replacement of timber flooring in building renovation. SERC Grant GR/D/76875. United Kingdom

Wright, H. D. & Evans, H. R. Burt, C.A. 1989. Profiled steel sheet/dry boarding composite floor. The Structural Engineer 67 (7): 114-129.
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Jaffar, M. I., Kamarulzaman, K., & Khalid, H. (2024). Performance Of Hybrid Green-Tech Lightweight Prism Composite Floor Panel. International Journal Of Technical Vocational And Engineering Technology, 5(1), 123-132. Retrieved from https://journal.pktm.com.my/index.php/ijtvet/article/view/149